Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fleet Systems Engineering Team: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Buckshot06 (talk | contribs) m my view |
|||
Line 11:
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Military|list of Military-related deletion discussions]]. </small><small>—[[User:Nick Dowling|Nick Dowling]] ([[User talk:Nick Dowling|talk]]) 01:18, 22 June 2008 (UTC)</small>
*'''Delete'''. Not notable. [[User:Buckshot06|Buckshot06]]([[User:Kirill Lokshin/Professionalism|prof]]) 02:18, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Sources included aren't really independent. Spawar helps design new systems for the navy and works closely w/ L-3. The house committee source is from the testimony of the spawar commander. I see that the user was in the navy (he was on a target, to boot) and now works for L-3, so he clearly has some interest and expertise. My suggestion is that he search out independent sources for the information provided. ''The Naval Engineer's Journal'' is a highly technical third part resource that may have an article on FSET installations. ''Seapower'', published by the Navy League is also sufficiently independent, so a promo story on FC's might work. All Hands is not technically independent, but is probably sufficient for an article like this. [[User:Protonk|Protonk]] ([[User talk:Protonk|talk]]) 02:29, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
| |||