Revision as of 07:49, 22 June 2008 edit Protonk (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 24,727 edits →Fleet Systems Engineering Team: copyedit ← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:56, 23 June 2008 edit undo Doktorbuk (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 21,801 edits →Fleet Systems Engineering Team: delete Next edit →
Line 12: '''Delete'''. Not notable. [[User:Buckshot06\|Buckshot06]]([[User:Kirill Lokshin/Professionalism\|prof]]) 02:18, 22 June 2008 (UTC) '''Delete''' Sources included aren't really independent. Spawar helps design new systems for the navy and works closely w/ L-3. The house committee source is from the testimony of the spawar commander. I see that the user was in the navy (he was on a target, to boot) and now works for L-3, so he clearly has some interest and expertise. My suggestion is that he search out independent sources for the information provided. ''The Naval Engineer's Journal'' is a highly technical third party resource that may have an article on FSET installations. ''Seapower'', published by the Navy League is also sufficiently independent, so a promo story on FC's might work. ''All Hands'' is not technically independent, but is probably sufficiently so for an article like this. [[User:Protonk\|Protonk]] ([[User talk:Protonk\|talk]]) 02:29, 22 June 2008 (UTC) *'''Delete''' non notable training scheme or organisation, article does not make much sense in either case. [[User:Doktorbuk\|doktorb]] <sub>[[User talk:Doktorbuk\|words]]</sub><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Doktorbuk\|deeds]]</sup> 18:56, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fleet Systems Engineering Team: Difference between revisions