Talk:Cantor's first set theory article/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 02:13, 15 April 2008

Revision as of 22:56, 24 June 2008

Line 108:

The article linked to complete lattices, and you're right the reals are not a complete lattice. They are a complete metric space, but that is not the subject here. I reworded it a little. I don't think "gapless" is better - we should try to explain things, but not to the point of inventing our own terminology. &mdash;&nbsp;Carl <small>([[User:CBM|CBM]]&nbsp;·&nbsp;[[User talk:CBM|talk]])</small> 13:15, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

I added an External Link from this page to [http://www.theoremoftheday.org/Theorems.html#19 Theorem of the Day, no. 19]. It seemed an innocent enough thing to do. Theorem of the Day is an academic project which tries to bring beautiful mathematics to a wider public without sacrificing rigour. It has over 100 theorems on offer now and is reasonably widely known. I am new to Wikipedia, however, so if this is what is regarded as spam, then maybe I rethink how I publicise my project? [[User:Charleswallingford|Charleswallingford]] ([[User talk:Charleswallingford|talk]]) 22:56, 24 June 2008 (UTC)