Revision as of 06:32, 11 July 2008 edit Kylu (talk \| contribs) Autopatrollers 5,915 edits m Meta talk:Administrators/confirm/bureaucrat chat/April 2008 moved to Meta:Administrators/confirm/bureaucrat chat/April 2008: Giving non-bureaucrats a place to comment on the bureaucrat chat. ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 11:58, 21 November 2010 edit undo PeterSymonds (talk \| contribs) 2,930 edits m Quick-adding category "Meta-Wiki administrator confirmation" (using HotCat)
Line 97: 71% + "bonus points" for steward and developer access. This one's close enough (within 5%) that I'd say our discretion would apply anyway. All those factors together, plus the more relaxed attitudes regarding adminship here, equates to a "we may as well keep 'em". <b><i><font color="#FF00FF">~Kylu ([[User:Kylu\|u]]\|[[User talk:Kylu\|t]]) </font></i></b> 22:49, 1 May 2008 (UTC) :I'd say keep too, for all the reasons listed above. Except one. Having a more relaxed attitude towards giving adminship shouldn't mean we be laxer on dealing out consensus when the retraction of the sysop bit is being considered; the fact that we have lax attitudes is therefore no reason to keep someone. But, as I have stated, I still think a keep is in order. --<strong>[[user:Anonymous Dissident\|<font face="Script MT Bold"><font color="DodgerBlue">Anonymous Dissident</font></font>]]</strong>[[user talk:Anonymous Dissident\|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:Gray">Talk</span></sup>]] 06:13, 2 May 2008 (UTC) [[Category:Meta-Wiki administrator confirmation]]

Meta:Administrators/confirm/bureaucrat chat/April 2008: Difference between revisions