Revision as of 00:50, 21 June 2005 edit 64.223.123.9 (talk) No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 14:17, 30 August 2005 edit undo Zzzzzzus (talk \| contribs) 1,363 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 10: Um, no, because the proper abbreviation is "opcode". Btw, this article is horrible at this point. One might suggest looking at the format of other wiki articles to start with. ¨As an example let's design a crude 4-bit microprocessor¨ This is a terrible bad example. A real one x86 should be used instead. Mess all the explanation.

Talk:Opcode: Difference between revisions