Wikipedia:Reference desk/Science: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m between 2n and 3n there's always a prime number: Rearranging to make clear (part of) my question was not answered. Please, do not archive it yet.
Line 661:
 
 
But (now)Now I know (thanks to anon above) that I am mistake, but I don't see where is my flaw. Can you help me? Sorry, need to go, my time at the [[LAN house]] is over. Se you tomorrow. --User:Mdob|Talk
 
 
In a hurry, since my time at the [[LAN house]] is almost over.
OK, here is a somewhat more elaborate proof of the relation to GC:
 
Line 752 ⟶ 751:
So, to GC to be FALSE, we would need an interval with no prime beetween 2n and 3n. Since this is impossible, GC follows.
 
So, where is my error? [[User:Mdob|User:Mdob]] | [[User talk:Mdob|Talk]] 22:25, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
But (now) I know (thanks to anon above) that I am mistake, but I don't see where is my flaw. Can you help me? Sorry, need to go, my time at the [[LAN house]] is over. Se you tomorrow. --User:Mdob|Talk
 
==Closed-source wiki software==