Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cryptographically secure random number generators: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
delete or preferably redirect |
|||
Line 10:
*'''Strong delte''' this is in effect a personal esay -- a collection of personal views on what makes a good CSRNG. This is all covered in more detail and in more encyclopediac fashion at [[cryptographically secure pseudo-random number generator]]. After deletion, create a preemtive redirect to that page, but theere is no reason to retain the current article in the page history. (If no consensus to delete, redir, do not simply keep)[[User:DESiegel|DES]] [[User talk:DESiegel|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 18:48, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
*''Delete''' OR. [[User:Dottoreso|Dottore So]] 00:56, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' or '''redirect'''. This is not only a personal opinion but sufficiently indistinct that it cannot even be tested (to the extent such things can be tested) as it stands. Actually the redirect to the CSPRNG would be best for readers looking for CSRNG should definitely be told that no such thing as a CSRNG actually exists and that the concept the term supposedly refers to is a snark. An important bit of context for the non cryptiacs. [[User:Ww|ww]] 18:46, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
| |||