Talk:Common Object Request Broker Architecture: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Subwy (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Subwy (talk | contribs)
Examples: new section
Line 85:
 
In addition to being grammatically unsound on several levels, this sentence is difficult to understand . . . and misleading at best. Red Hat neither engineered nor is the maintainer of GTK+ ("the GNOME UI system"). I'm looking to move/modify this, but I'd like some input on what the original intent was. Was the author merely confused as to Red Hat's responsibilities and what GTK+ is? <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Brian Geppert|Brian Geppert]] ([[User talk:Brian Geppert|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Brian Geppert|contribs]]) 17:47, 12 March 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 
== Examples ==
 
I think a code example in one of the languages where the binding is relatively standard, e.g. Java of how CORBA is used would be helpful. Since I don't know that much about how CORBA is used, I don't actually know if that makes sense, but if it does, an example should definitely be in the article. [[User:Subwy|Subwy]] ([[User talk:Subwy|talk]]) 18:20, 15 July 2008 (UTC)