Content deleted Content added
→Contraction mappings: Bear in mind WP:V#Burden of evidence |
|||
Line 123:
:::The same material has been published in regular scientific channels, eg Applications of Evolutionary Computing, 2005, LNCS 3449 http://www.springer.com/computer/foundations/book/978-3-540-25396-9 and ACM Non-Photorealistic Animation and Rendering; The Electric Sheep and their Dreams in High Fidelity; Scott Draves (invited keynote) June 2006 http://www.siggraph.org/events/symposia/npar2006 But the Flame paper linked here is more accessible and complete. And if you google for "contractive on average" you will see others using this phrase for IFS. The reference was already in the bibliography I am just letting you know what page specifically... [[User:Spot|Spot]] ([[User talk:Spot|talk]]) 22:22, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
::::References published in regular scientific channels would be the appropriate ones to add. If you have one which defines "contractive on average" then by all means add that too. Bear in mind that [[WP:V#Burden of evidence]] puts the onus on you to do that when you add material. [[User:Richard Pinch|Richard Pinch]] ([[User talk:Richard Pinch|talk]]) 22:38, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
:::::I didn't add the reference, it has been there for years, I'm just telling you on what page you can find the statement in the references already used that backs up the edit in question. Do the references really have to define it or just use the phrase? This is a statement about the computer graphics technique of IFS, not the mathematical objects, maybe it should just go into the section on constructions, which also includes implementation info such as the effect of zooming. I think that would be an best what do you think? [[User:Spot|Spot]] ([[User talk:Spot|talk]]) 22:54, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
| |||