Content deleted Content added
Line 124:
::::References published in regular scientific channels would be the appropriate ones to add. If you have one which defines "contractive on average" then by all means add that too. Bear in mind that [[WP:V#Burden of evidence]] puts the onus on you to do that when you add material. [[User:Richard Pinch|Richard Pinch]] ([[User talk:Richard Pinch|talk]]) 22:38, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
:::::I didn't add the reference, it has been there for years, I'm just telling you on what page you can find the statement in the references already used that backs up the edit in question. Do the references really have to define it or just use the phrase? This is a statement about the computer graphics technique of IFS, not the mathematical objects, maybe it should just go into the section on constructions, which also includes implementation info such as the effect of zooming. I think that would be an best what do you think? [[User:Spot|Spot]] ([[User talk:Spot|talk]]) 22:54, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
:::::Looks like this paper defines it: http://ace.acadiau.ca/math/mendivil/Papers/infifs.ps
| |||