Revision as of 23:10, 1 February 2004 edit Mav (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 77,874 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 00:52, 2 February 2004 edit undo IMSoP (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 4,561 edits :To answer the question, I think it is functioning as designed Next edit →
Line 74: :I agree. Having 'right' or a specified width should tell the software that the last bit of text is a caption and not just alternate text. But in cases where the position or width is ''not'' specified the software must treat it the old way and ''not'' create a caption. --[[User:Maveric149\|mav]] 23:10, 1 Feb 2004 (UTC) :To answer the question, I think it is functioning as designed: the ''caption text'' or ''alt-text'' or whatever you want to call it is not "thrown away", it is merely acting the same way as the old-style syntax of <nowiki>[[image:digital_dec_logo.jpg\|Logo of Digital Equipment Corporation]]</nowiki> would do. In my opinion, using it as <tt>title</tt>, <tt>alt</tt> ''and'' an inline caption is somewhat overdoing it anyway... - [[User:IMSoP\|IMSoP]] 00:52, 2 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Extended image syntax: Difference between revisions