Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Master Control Program (Tron): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
question |
KieferSkunk (talk | contribs) Reply to Le Grand Roi |
||
Line 28:
***If you can pull that off without violating [[WP:FICT]] and [[WP:TRIVIA]], be my guest. But I have my doubts that that will be possible. — '''[[User:KieferSkunk|KieferSkunk]]''' ([[User talk:KieferSkunk|talk]]) — 19:47, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
****How cany anyone violate [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Notability_%28fiction%29&action=history WP:FICT], given that the community has yet to even decide if it is historical, an essays, etc.? --<font face="Times New Roman">Happy editing! Sincerely, [[User:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles|<span style="color:#009">Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles|Tally-ho!]]''</sup> 20:17, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
*****We may not have a full consensus on that one yet, but the overall spirit of the essay/guideline is to ensure that articles about fictional content don't go into an unnecessary level of depth about the fictional universe, characters, etc. In general (and in keeping with the core policies, [[WP:NOT]], etc.), we want to keep such info limited to what is necessary to understand the topic as a whole. Trivia and in-depth descriptions are rarely appropriate - not to say they are ''never'' appropriate, but it's not very often that they are. — '''[[User:KieferSkunk|KieferSkunk]]''' ([[User talk:KieferSkunk|talk]]) — 20:33, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
|