Content deleted Content added
→Introductory sub section: new section |
SamJohnston (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 26:
deleted
[[User:Sanjiv swarup|Sanjiv swarup]] ([[User talk:Sanjiv swarup|talk]]) 03:15, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
== WTF? ==
The first sentence of the article conveys no meaning or significance or reason. What?--[[User:Shtove|Shtove]] ([[User talk:Shtove|talk]]) 21:54, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
:Unfortunately, the rest of the article doesn't do much to explain the topic, either. I'd like to slap this with an expert-subject tag, because cleanup and clarification cannot take place if the subject matter is unintelligible in the first place. I'd like to remove the spam tag, since the references seem to point to decent sources, and the external links has its own tag. Any objections to this? [[User:WouterdeGroot|Wouter de Groot]] ([[User talk:WouterdeGroot|talk]]) 13:38, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
::Given it is currently a marketing term, why not focus not on defining what it is -that is too vague- but in the growth of the term? [[User:SteveLoughran|SteveLoughran]] ([[User talk:SteveLoughran|talk]]) 21:25, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
:::100% agreed. Fixed now. [[User:SamJohnston|samj]] ([[User talk:SamJohnston|talk]]) 08:44, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
| |||