Content deleted Content added
SamJohnston (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
SamJohnston (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 97:
:: Alright so now the article has been completely overhauled and properly referenced (per complaints made about it) it's pretty clear that my edits weren't spam so I'm archiving this. [[User:SamJohnston|samj]] ([[User talk:SamJohnston|talk]]) 08:37, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
==Vague and confusing==
This article can be written better than it is now.[[User:Chmyr|Chmyr]] ([[User talk:Chmyr|talk]]) 02:13, 12 April 2008 (UTC
: Agreed, this article reads like some boring, nasal nerd who's trying to impress you with jargon instead of getting actual points across. I think many readers are going to walk away from this article still having no clue whatsoever what the general term of "cloud computing" is referring to. Once we cut through the hype, jargon and nerdgos... maybe we can actually have people leave this article with some understanding of it? Is that too much to ask? LOL
: When it comes down to it, it's a fairly simply concept (not the implementation and all the derivatives, but the CONCEPT itself). Typically, it's using the power of multiple computers across the internet to work in unison (or you could say in harmony) to accomplish tasks that require a lot of processing power and storage that would otherwise overwhelm the capabilities of an average computer working alone. There, I said it. LOL [[User:Cowicide|Cowicide]] ([[User talk:Cowicide|talk]]) 00:34, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
: I believe the article can be more simpler than what it is. The concept of Cloud computing loses it track at the bottom...
[[User:Dhoomady|Dhoomady]] ([[User talk:Dhoomady|talk]]) 11:01, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
: I agree with [[User:Chmyr|Chmyr]] and [[User:Cowicide|Cowicide]] This article needs some attention to meet wikipedia standards. [[User:Kalivd|Kalivd]] ([[User talk:Kalivd|talk]]) 14:14, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
: This page makes no sense at all. In fact, the picture of "The Cloud" with the corresponding caption summarizes this article perfectly, much ado about hot air.
So well put and simply stated above by [[User:Chmyr|Chmyr]] and [[User:Cowicide|Cowicide]] . I run an IT Knowledge Solutions company and am still amazed how complicated our profession make concepts sound to the not technical person. Lets get over it and help people move into this new age. Thank you for clearing this up for me. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/61.69.34.229|61.69.34.229]] ([[User talk:61.69.34.229|talk]]) 10:59, 27 June 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
I am planning on archiving this sub section. no action : all talk !! [[User:Sanjiv swarup|Sanjiv swarup]] ([[User talk:Sanjiv swarup|talk]]) 09:14, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
:There is no point in archiving a discussion just because there has been no action. Please don't. --[[User:CliffC|CliffC]] ([[User talk:CliffC|talk]]) 12:24, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
: I agree with previous authors, this article is misleading and has lots of erraneous statements. It's been written by incompetent people. I wish it wouldn't exist at all. I can't give all of my arguments here, because of unusual discussion format (Just a single note: Enomalism is not a cloud, but little piece of python code). We have an extended discussion on the definition of cloud at groups.google.com/group/cloud-computing If you have arguments against, let's do it in proper environemnt. [[User:Sapenov|Sapenov]] ([[User talk:Sapenov|talk]]) 03:04, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
i think it would be nice if there could be an article or something within Wikipedia that would match the standards of wikipedia.[[User:Anoopnair2050|Anoopnair2050]] ([[User talk:Anoopnair2050|talk]]) 15:16, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your comments. I've spent the last days overhauling the article and I hope you are all more satisfied with it now. Feel free to contribute yourself. [[User:SamJohnston|samj]] ([[User talk:SamJohnston|talk]]) 08:51, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
| |||