Multivariate landing page optimization: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Gmazeroff (talk | contribs)
m minor copy editing
Gmazeroff (talk | contribs)
m minor copy editing
Line 28:
 
=== Advantages ===
* Capable of testing the effect of variations as a real-life experience.
* Generally transparent to visitors.
* Relatively simple and inexpensive to execute (e.g., [[Google website optimizer|Google Website Optimizer]]).
 
=== Disadvantages ===
''Note: These disadvantages are applicable mostly to the live environment tools available prior to Google Website Optimizer.''
* High cost.
* Increased complexity involved in modifying a production-level website.
* Long period of time required to achieve statistically-reliable data. This situation is due to variations in the amount of traffic, whichthat generates the data necessary for a decision.
* Likely inappropriate for low-traffic, high-importance websites when the site administrators do not want to lose any potential customers.
 
== Simulation (survey) execution ==
Line 43:
 
=== Advantages ===
* Faster and easier to prepare and execute in many cases, as compared to live environment execution.
* Applicable to low-traffic websites.
* Capable of producing more robust and rich data because of increased control over the page design.
 
=== Disadvantages ===
* Possible bias because of a simulated environment rather than a live environment.
* Necessity to recruit and optionally incentivize the respondents.
 
== References ==