Revision as of 18:22, 10 September 2005 edit Hipocrite (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 22,615 edits →[[MidiNotate Composer]] ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:53, 10 September 2005 edit undo Sherryc (talk \| contribs) 49 edits →[[MidiNotate Composer]] Next edit →
Line 8: '''Delete'''. Bunchofgrapes sums up my thoughts. --[[User:GraemeL\|GraemeL]] [[User_talk:GraemeL\|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 11:51, 10 September 2005 (UTC) '''Delete'''. Ad. [[User:Hipocrite\|Hipocrite]] - [[User talk:Hipocrite\|«<small>Talk</small>»]] 18:22, 10 September 2005 (UTC) *'''Response to rewrite request''' I would be happy to rewrite the article to sound more "encyclopedic". My apologies if the article sounded too "personal" - I've found many entries on Wikipedia to be quite helpful to me in finding out about many resources, and I was merely adding a voice to that community. I'm not quite clear that a rewrite would be appropriate at this time, though. It seems that it would be more appropriate as a resubmission after the vote is decided for the current article. Is this correct? [[User:Sherryc\|Sherryc]] 22:53, 10 September 2005 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MidiNotate Composer: Difference between revisions