Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MidiNotate Composer: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:09, 11 September 2005

Revision as of 23:12, 11 September 2005

Line 13:

*'''Rewrite''' Ok, I can definitely rewrite it, but I'd appreciate some input. I apparently shouldn't use existing articles as a model, because I did that and it's caused the ruckus :) What are your suggestions? I'll start with 1) use third person rather than second person 2)more background on the evolution of the software 3) noted capabilities. Does this seem appropriate? Please remember, this article is listed in the category of "music software", and you can check out the other articles in the category. To my eye, this one follows the same model, so I'm honestly trying to find out what the major problems are here so we can make this an informational entry. I see part of the strength of the Wikipedia as giving current information about a myriad of topics, as well as resources related to those topics (hence the "external links" sections). I want to do this right! Thanks. [[User:Sherryc|Sherryc]] 12:45, 11 September 2005 (UTC)

**'''Response''' All the above would be good. Plus, I suggest you use an article like [[Finale notation program]] as a basis: it's the most well-rounded article of the [[Scorewriter]] bunch. You also need references to claims such as "in wide use" and so on. Your willingness to improve this article is very welcome! [[User:Randywombat|Wombat]] 17:09, 11 September 2005 (UTC)

*'''Rewrite complete''' I've rewritten the article, and would like some constructive feedback. Please let me know what you think, or if you see room for improvement. I've condensed two articles into this one, with the thought of deleting the other one, following the example in the [[Finale notation program]] as suggested above. Thanks. [[User:Sherryc|Sherryc]] 23:12, 11 September 2005 (UTC)