Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MidiNotate Composer: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 23:12, 11 September 2005

Revision as of 00:39, 12 September 2005

Line 4:

*I'll ask the same thing here as in the other one: Where's the ad? Otherwise, this one's more clearly in the '''Keep''' column: 21K [http://www.google.com/search?hs=HXu&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&q=%22Midinotate+Composer%22&btnG=Search Google hits], notability established. Sure, it doesn't have the notability of the [[Cakewalk (company)|Cakewalk]] MIDI composer, but would you delete [[Arby's]] just because it wasn't as notable as [[McDonald's]]? -- [[User:IlGreven|Grev]] -- [[User_talk:IlGreven|Talk]] 02:41, September 10, 2005 (UTC)

*'''Comment''': This article is in keeping with other articles about other music software in the same category. I used the other articles as examples to work from, and was offering this information to inform others about what types of music software programs are available. You can check out the other articles in the same category, and I think you will find that they are in the same vein as this one. [[User:Sherryc|Sherryc]] 03:18, 10 September 2005 (UTC)

*<s>'''Delete''' as ad. It just ''smells'' like a press release. I'll gladly change my vote if someone ([[User:Sherryc|Sherryc]]?) rewrites it to smell like - say - an encyclopedia entry instead. [[User:Bunchofgrapes|Bunchofgrapes]] 04:32, 10 September 2005 (UTC)</s> See vote change below.

*Same comment as above &mdash;[[User:Wahoofive|Wahoofive]] ([[User talk:Wahoofive|talk]]) 04:45, 10 September 2005 (UTC)

*'''Delete'''. Bunchofgrapes sums up my thoughts. --[[User:GraemeL|GraemeL]] [[User_talk:GraemeL|^(talk)]] 11:51, 10 September 2005 (UTC)

Line 14:

**'''Response''' All the above would be good. Plus, I suggest you use an article like [[Finale notation program]] as a basis: it's the most well-rounded article of the [[Scorewriter]] bunch. You also need references to claims such as "in wide use" and so on. Your willingness to improve this article is very welcome! [[User:Randywombat|Wombat]] 17:09, 11 September 2005 (UTC)

*'''Rewrite complete''' I've rewritten the article, and would like some constructive feedback. Please let me know what you think, or if you see room for improvement. I've condensed two articles into this one, with the thought of deleting the other one, following the example in the [[Finale notation program]] as suggested above. Thanks. [[User:Sherryc|Sherryc]] 23:12, 11 September 2005 (UTC)

*Changing vote to '''keep''' based on rewrite. It's a little rah-rah, with more detail than I honestly think the subject deserves in Wikipedia, but it reads largely like an encyclopedia entry now, I suppose. [[User:Bunchofgrapes|Bunchofgrapes]] 00:39, 12 September 2005 (UTC)