Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/IP check/Archive: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Luna Santin (talk | contribs) Archiving. |
Luna Santin (talk | contribs) old cases to archive |
||
Line 65:
::Could we still do those range blocks, providing we have both anon users only and account creation enabled? --'''[[User:AAA!|<span style="color:red">AAA!</span>]]''' <small>([[User talk:AAA!|<span style="color:green">AAAA</span>]])</small> 17:30, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
:::I have blocked both ranges, but I have allowed account creation on them both. AAA, if you happen to see a similar pattern of vandalism to those types of articles, let a checkuser know. (be sure you have lots of evidence, as in several days worth showing the pattern). No existing accounts will be affected by the block. —— '''[[user:nixeagle|<font color="navy">nix</font>]][[User talk:Nixeagle|<font color="red">eagle]]'''</font> 17:53, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
===Harold Hreem===
* {{checkuser|Harold Hreem}}
* {{checkuser|James 45uyh}}
* {{checkuser|Sup buds 954}}
* {{checkuser|32i8h5jui}}
* {{checkuser|O34ijt5oj5}}
* {{checkuser|24ij5i324u5tio8u3480t5ju34i890t0i89345gti89ju}}
* {{checkuser|Versedoor creator}}
Persistent, irritating vandal who keeps creating new accounts in order to make edits like these: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=PowerBook_100&diff=230785907&oldid=230785571]
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=PowerBook_100&diff=230785291&oldid=230785264]
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=PowerBook_100&diff=230784198&oldid=230784123]
[[User:Reyk|<font color="Maroon">'''Reyk'''</font>]] <sub>[[User talk:Reyk|'''<font color="Blue">YO!</font>''']]</sub> 10:46, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
:These are similar to others in [[:Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Primetime]]. --[[User:Snigbrook|Snigbrook]] [[User talk:Snigbrook|<sup><span style="color:red">(</span><span style="color:green">talk</span><span style="color:red">)</span></sup>]] 11:58, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
: While it's not Primetime, far as I can see, it's hard to block IPs or ranges here, as they cover a large range of IPs. They're pretty-much all over the place - [[User:Alison|<span style="color:#FF823D;font-family:Monotype Corsiva">'''A<font color="#FF7C0A">l<font color="#FFB550">is</font>o</font>n'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Alison|❤]]</sup> 07:37, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
===ShiningPath===
*{{checkuser|ShiningPath}}
ShiningPath is an SPA, appears to have assimilated WP conventions instantly, then disappeared after having removed links s/he didn't like from several hundred pages. Can this user be checked as a possible sockpuppet? Thank you, [[User:Badagnani|Badagnani]] ([[User talk:Badagnani|talk]]) 19:04, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
:{{clerknote}} Request reformatted. <span style="background:#E0FFFF;color:#007FFF;font-family:Georgia;">[[User:Nishkid64|Nishkid64]] </span><sub>([[User talk:Nishkid64|Make articles, not wikidrama]])</sub> 03:43, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
:: {{declined}} - fishing expedition[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Badagnani&diff=prev&oldid=230243437] with no evidence whatsoever. Has there actually been any abuse here you can point to? - [[User:Alison|<span style="color:#FF823D;font-family:Monotype Corsiva">'''A<font color="#FF7C0A">l<font color="#FFB550">is</font>o</font>n'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Alison|❤]]</sup> 08:52, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' - The edits were questionable and it seems likely that this is a longtime editor who did not want any repercussions for his/her removals of websites from many dozens, or hundreds of articles. Most importantly, I was under the impression that it's not permissible to have multiple registered accounts, whether or not the editor believes it's justifiable. [[User:Badagnani|Badagnani]] ([[User talk:Badagnani|talk]]) 19:29, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
: Per [[WP:SOCK]], you actually ''can'', but it's in your best interests to declare the links. Deliberately avoiding scrutiny while being disruptive is a no-no, but I'm not seeing that here - [[User:Alison|<span style="color:#FF823D;font-family:Monotype Corsiva">'''A<font color="#FF7C0A">l<font color="#FFB550">is</font>o</font>n'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Alison|❤]]</sup> 19:45, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
::I think the response depends on who the main account is (if there is one). If the user is blocked or has a long block log and a reputation for acting contentiously, then it might be acceptable to disclose the main account. If the user is in good standing, then there may be no reason to declare the other name; on the other hand, the SPA has given up the ability to comment meaningfully on the issue when editors restore the links. So I checked; there is nothing obvious. This is a textbook case of {{fishing}}. The question "Who is X" is often much harder to answer than, "Is X related to Y." Here, nothing stands out. [[User talk:Thatcher|Thatcher]] 20:40, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
| |||