Revision as of 09:48, 13 September 2005 edit Amerindianarts (talk \| contribs) 2,493 edits →Converse or inverse ← Previous edit		Revision as of 02:57, 14 September 2005 edit undo Gene.arboit (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 1,077 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 22: :Agreed. [[User:Amerindianarts\|Amerindianarts]] 09:48, 13 September 2005 (UTC) ::I think I see the point. (''B'' → ''C'') → ''A'', i.e. (''B'' &and; ¬ ''C'') &or; ''A'', is not equivalent to ''C'' → (''A'' &and; ''B''), i.e. ¬ ''C'' &or; (''A'' &and; ''B''). Should this be mentioned in the ''converse'' article, perhaps? [[User:Gene.arboit\|Gene.arboit]] 02:57, 14 September 2005 (UTC)

Talk:Converse (logic): Difference between revisions