The Case for Mars: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Marskell (talk | contribs)
Marskell (talk | contribs)
Line 29:
===Risks confronted===
 
In the fifth chapter various risks that putatively rule out a long-term human presence on Mars are analyzed. Zubrin dismisses the idea that radiation and zero-gravity are unduly hazardous. [[Cancer]] rates do increase for astronauts who have spent extensive time in space, but only marginally. Similarly, while zero-gravity presents challenges, “near total recovery of musculature and immune system occurs after reentry and reconditioning to a one-gravity environment.” [[Back -contamination]], meanwhile—humans acquiring and spreading Martian [[viruses]]—is "just plain nuts" given that disease organisms are specifically keyed to hosts.
 
In the same chapter, Zubrin decisively rejects suggestions that [[Moon]] should be used as waypoint to Mars or as a training area. It is ultimately much easier to journey to Mars from low Earth orbit than from the moon and using the latter as a staging point is a pointless diversion of resources. While the Moon may superficially appear a good place to perfect Mars exploration and habitation techniques, the two bodies are radically different. The moon has no atmosphere, no analogous [[geology]] and a much greater temperature range and rotational period. [[Antartica]] or desert areas of Earth provide much better training grounds at much less the cost.