Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Useful unix command (second nomination): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
**Did you look at the ''comments'' in the previous vfd, 100% of which clearly favored either a deletion or a transwiki as I stated, or just count which words they bolded? ~~~~ |
Tony Sidaway (talk | contribs) →[[Useful unix command]]: Reply to cryptic and apology |
||
Line 8:
*'''Speedy delete'''. [[User:Andrew pmk|Andrew pmk]] | [[User_talk:Andrew pmk|Talk]] 23:56, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
*'''Speedy delete.''' CSD-criteria should be interpreted far more liberally. / [[User:Karmosin|Peter]] <sup>[[User talk:Karmosin|Isotalo]]</sup> 01:07, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. <s>Censure nominator for bad faith renomination of an article properly closed just two days ago with no consensus, and for falsely claiming that the previous result was unanimous for transwiki.</s> See apology below. --[[User:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]][[User talk:Tony Sidaway|<small><sup>Talk</sup></small>]] 01:13, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
**Did you look at the ''comments'' in the previous vfd, 100% of which clearly favored either a deletion or a transwiki as I stated, or just count which words they bolded? —[[User:Cryptic|Cryptic]] [[User talk:Cryptic|(talk)]] 09:06, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
**Firstly I think I was far too harsh in assuming bad faith above, and I withdraw that imputation and apologise without reserve. However you said, or appeared to say, that all agreed to transwiki, now you say all favored either deletion or transwiki. Don't you see that deletion and transwiki are completely different operations? --[[User:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]][[User talk:Tony Sidaway|<small><sup>Talk</sup></small>]] 11:43, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
| |||