Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/200.215.40.3: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
whoops, IP doesn't look to be the same guy |
m the affected articles on enwiki easily surpass two articles; making a note of that |
||
Line 46:
* '''[[WP:RFCU#code letters|Code letter]]:''' C
* '''Supporting evidence:''' I have filed two lengthy reports regarding the issue. It all started in November of last year, when [[Special:Contributions/200.215.40.3|200.215.40.3]] kept playing around with my edits and went Wiki-stalking with my contributions. Eventually, 200.215.40.3 was blocked for a period of two days on December 24. What I didn't notice was that the user was very active on several projects. In fact, by the time he started disrupting enwiki, he had already made a lot of '''edits on ptwiki, itwiki and lawiki''' (see [http://toolserver.org/~luxo/contributions/contributions.php?user=200.215.40.3&lang= Global Contribs of 200.215.40.3]). The user lives in Brazil (I know this for a fact as there are more Portuguese edits than Spanish; also see WHOIS) and, thus, edits in Portugese and English for the most part. After the block expired, [[Pontiff]] and [[Holy Father]] were two of many articles that were still negatively affected. In Portugese Wikipedia, [[W:pt:Sua Santidade|Sua Santidade]] ("His Holiness") was negatively affected. The user was involved in changing all of the links/names (ie: opposite of "dab" linking), which was considered to be actually quite minor at the time. However, the user was evidently denying requests (the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A200.215.40.3&diff=165766245&oldid=162283942 first one was] made by [[User:Andrew c|Andrew c]]) to kindly discuss the issue as they were used solely for that purpose. The problem became obvious to me by the time he/she had only reverted a few times and had wrote almost as many negative edit summaries.
* The first report that I filed, '''''[[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/200.215.40.3]]''''', brought attention regarding this issue. What that report didn't cover was the handful of accounts that were created as spares in order to evade the blocks. Afterwards, a few days ago, I filed the second report, '''''[[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Benkenobi is a retardate]]''''', which concluded with indefinite blocks for all of the checkusered accounts and ended also with the idea of further action regarding cross-wiki vandalism (I'll deal with that mostly on Meta). Like the edits on enwiki, '''ptwiki''' and the other projects were, again, negatively affected by this user (ie: the '''[[W:pt:Sua Santidade|Sua Santidade]]''' article), a lot of which were edited by the user either for either needlessly changing the names (against naming conventions), or deletion of content or POV changes on Coptic Orthodox-related articles (definitely against me specifically). In regards to those edits, I strongly feel that it is against the Wikimedia Foundation's [http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Non_discrimination_policy Policy on Discrimination].
| |||