Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DriveImage XML: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Jimmi Hugh (talk | contribs) →DriveImage XML: Comment and Weak Delete |
reply |
||
Line 6:
:'''Weak delete''', besides the obvious notability problems (which for me was not a problem in itself IF this was a excellent product), this program offers nothing more than products that alredy exist, (like [[Acronis True Image]], for example) it does not have a [[Live CD]], and it is not [[cross-platform]]... [[User:SF007|SF007]] ([[User talk:SF007|talk]]) 17:06, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
::'''Comment''' Your opinion on the product's quality, as well as your narrow expectation of the product's features are of absolutely no concern to the deletion process. - [[User:Jimmi Hugh|Jimmi Hugh]] ([[User talk:Jimmi Hugh|talk]]) 18:20, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
:::I just said that because if this product was clearly better than the alternatives I think it's inclusion on wikipedia should be considered (and I would vote "Keep"), regarding the notability policy, since policy are not rigid rules and are only to make a better wikipedia and to protect it from spam. (but nevermind, this is not the case...) [[User:SF007|SF007]] ([[User talk:SF007|talk]]) 18:36, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
:'''Weak Delete''' Apart from what appears to be a procedural article in pcmag.com, no notable mention of the products use, or reviews that can verify it as a widely adopted application. - [[User:Jimmi Hugh|Jimmi Hugh]] ([[User talk:Jimmi Hugh|talk]]) 18:20, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
| |||