Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DriveImage XML: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Jimmi Hugh (talk | contribs) Standardised Formatting |
Jimmi Hugh (talk | contribs) Questioned reasoning |
||
Line 7:
**'''Comment''' Your opinion on the product's quality, as well as your narrow expectation of the product's features are of absolutely no concern to the deletion process. - [[User:Jimmi Hugh|Jimmi Hugh]] ([[User talk:Jimmi Hugh|talk]]) 18:20, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
***I just said that because if this product was clearly better than the alternatives I think it's inclusion on wikipedia should be considered (and I would vote "Keep"), regarding the notability policy, since policy are not rigid rules and are only to make a better wikipedia and to protect it from spam. (but nevermind, this is not the case...) [[User:SF007|SF007]] ([[User talk:SF007|talk]]) 18:36, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
****'''Comment''' My point precisely... you base your decisions to keep or delete upon personal opinion of the product, which is completely inappropriate and absolutely no help to Wikipedia. While deletion requires discussion either way and there is little way you can sway the decision with your comments, it doesn't help the process if you come in and discuss things so highly off topic, please try to consider the article based upon policy in the future, thanks. - [[User:Jimmi Hugh|Jimmi Hugh]] ([[User talk:Jimmi Hugh|talk]]) 16:17, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
*'''Weak Delete''' Apart from what appears to be a procedural article in pcmag.com, no notable mention of the products use, or reviews that can verify it as a widely adopted application. - [[User:Jimmi Hugh|Jimmi Hugh]] ([[User talk:Jimmi Hugh|talk]]) 18:20, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
| |||