Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DriveImage XML: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
reply |
Jimmi Hugh (talk | contribs) →DriveImage XML: Wikipedia: Opinionated Quality Software Only |
||
Line 9:
****'''Comment''' My point precisely... you base your decisions to keep or delete upon personal opinion of the product, which is completely inappropriate and absolutely no help to Wikipedia. While deletion requires discussion either way and there is little way you can sway the decision with your comments, it doesn't help the process if you come in and discuss things so highly off topic, please try to consider the article based upon policy in the future, thanks. - [[User:Jimmi Hugh|Jimmi Hugh]] ([[User talk:Jimmi Hugh|talk]]) 16:17, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
*****My point was that the [[Wikipedia:Notability|notability "policy"]] is not really a policy, it's "just" a guideline... but I know what you mean... [[User:SF007|SF007]] ([[User talk:SF007|talk]]) 19:42, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
******Nope, i'm pretty sure you were commenting on the quality of the software and won't just retract it. - [[User:Jimmi Hugh|Jimmi Hugh]] ([[User talk:Jimmi Hugh|talk]]) 01:32, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
*'''Weak Delete''' Apart from what appears to be a procedural article in pcmag.com, no notable mention of the products use, or reviews that can verify it as a widely adopted application. - [[User:Jimmi Hugh|Jimmi Hugh]] ([[User talk:Jimmi Hugh|talk]]) 18:20, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
| |||