Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Discoveries/Log/2008/September: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 00:31, 2 September 2008

Revision as of 11:39, 6 September 2008

Line 2:

===NEW DISCOVERIES===

<!-- Please add new discoveries immediately below here, with header level === -->

==={{tl|Liliales-stub}} / {{cl|Liliales stubs}}===

New unproposed stub type for an order of monocot plants, complete with its own category (don't you love it when unproposed categories spring up with the WP:WSS notice saying not to create stub types without proposal already in them? Sort of adding insult to injury, or - in this case - perhaps gilding the lily is a better term). Problem with this one is that {{cl|Monocot stubs}} has fewer than 210 unsubcatted stubs, so it's not within a bull's roar of needing a further new split. It also greatly reduces the chances that this type - currently with 25 stubs - will get close to threshold. The template may well be useful in the long run, but it should very likely be upmerged for now. [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''<small><font color="#008822">[[User_talk:Grutness|wha?]]</font></small>'' 11:39, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

==={{tl|Defensive-lineman-1990s-stub}} / {{cl|Defensive lineman, 1990s birth stubs}}===

Unproposed, but at least the template seems reasonable. Seems to have been pasted over from the equivalent 1980s template and category... Unfortunately, the new category is a problem, however, since it's clearly not likely to reach threshold in the immediate future (I doubt we have 60 stub articles on teenaged defensive linemen at present). Suggest that for the time being upmerging would probably be the most sensible option. [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''<small><font color="#008822">[[User_talk:Grutness|wha?]]</font></small>'' 00:31, 2 September 2008 (UTC)