Content deleted Content added
→How accurate is an ASIO file?: add quote |
|||
Line 35:
== How accurate is an ASIO file? ==
People who have obtained parts of their files have said their files contain notable inaccuracies<ref name="inaccuracies 1">[http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/news/national/files-reveal-the-silly-scary-spies-eyeview-of-aboriginal-history/2007/11/04/1194117879784.html] "Brisbane Times" Joel Gibson [[Nov 5]], [[2007]] ''"Files reveal the silly scary spies' eye-view of Aboriginal history"''. Chicka Dixon says "there are lots of errors". Gary Foley says "we were accused of a plot to blow up the 28-storey headquarters of the Department of Aboriginal Affairs in Canberra. I knew nothing of this until I read it in my file a couple of years ago".</ref> and have noted considerable censured content.<ref name="Hammond file 1">"Sydney Morning Herald" Dani Valent [[Feb 23]], [[2008]] ''"Favourite things"'' page 55 Good Living, shows photograph of Mary Hammond holding ASIO file with censored text.</ref><ref name="Censured Content 2">ABC's Phillip Adams refers to his censored ASIO file content on Late Night Live in August 2007.</ref> A royal commission
The National Archives of Australia has, in consultation with ASIO, negotiated a process and subjects of files may now submit a written statement outlining as clearly and concisely as possible any inaccuracies they believe their file (or a file of a deceased spouse or parent) contains. The National Archives cannot change the contents of the file but will add the subject's statement to the file. The subject's statement should only address material in the file already.<ref name="inaccuracies 2'>[http://www.naa.gov.au/about-us/publications/fact-sheets/fs53.aspx#section2] National Archives of Australia, Fact sheet 53, accuracy of personal information and courses of action if you are the subject of a file.</ref>
|