Wikipedia:Graphics Lab/Images to improve/Archive/Jul 2008: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
DyceBot (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 1 stale section and 0 resolved sections.
Line 420:
::::::::: I think that's a huge improvement. It definitely implies the correct scale. Let's see what the physicists say. I'll replace some of the existing images with the new one and ask for comments. [[User:Dhatfield|Dhatfield]] ([[User talk:Dhatfield|talk]]) 11:49, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Been in numerous articles with no negative comments. Resolved - thanks MissMJ. [[User:Dhatfield|Dhatfield]] ([[User talk:Dhatfield|talk]]) 22:33, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
 
:No offense guys, I think the original one was better. The gradients look amateurish on the new one (they aren't correct for the forms), the stars don't mean anything, and the original one had a nice simplicity to it. The original one looks like it could be in a science textbook. The new one looks like it is something someone made for Wikipedia. Just my two cents. When I am looking for a light cone image to use, I'm going to use the first one, not the second one. --[[Special:Contributions/98.217.8.46|98.217.8.46]] ([[User talk:98.217.8.46|talk]]) 15:10, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 
== Image:APISmap1.pdf ==