Wikimedia South Africa/Copyright Amendment Bill: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 461:
*'''6 September 2022:''' [https://www.iol.co.za/capeargus/news/creatives-parties-divided-over-passage-of-copyright-amendment-bill-97075440-a367-433f-a216-0f665da8d750 Creatives, parties divided over passage of Copyright Amendment Bill] (Cape Argus) by Mwangi Githahu. Describes the second passage of the bill and quotes the ACDP, ReCreate, and the The Copyright Coalition of South Africa.
*'''7 September 2022:''' <span style="background:#FF0000">A</span> [https://www.businesslive.co.za/bd/opinion/letters/2022-09-07-letter-blinding-copyright-bill/ LETTER: Blinding copyright bill] (Business Day) by Owen Dean. "Experienced and knowledgeable legal practitioners, objective expert academics and well-balanced business people, not to mention those who create original works for their livelihood, have time and again told the government that the Copyright Amendment Bill is fundamentally flawed, badly drafted and generally poor quality and unworkable legislation that is an embarrassment to SA in the international milieu."
*'''15 September 2022:''' <span style="background:#00FF00">F</span> [https://www.groundup.org.za/article/new-bill-will-remedy-many-evils-of-current-copyright-regime/ New copyright bill will take South Africa into the 21st century at last] (GroundUP & Daily Maverick) by Denise Rosemary Nicholson, Opinion. Denise argues that the CAB will "give South African artists and creators benefits and rights already enjoyed in many countries." Also discusses misinformation in the media around the CAB, balancing mechanisms, what Fair Use is, and why it is beneficial to society,
==References==
| |||