Content deleted Content added
m copyedit recent additions |
No edit summary |
||
Line 5:
The conjecture states that this phenomenon of repeated values holds for every ''n''. That is, for every ''n'' there is at least one other integer ''m'' ≠ ''n'' such that φ(''m'') = φ(''n'').
[[Robert Daniel Carmichael|Robert Carmichael]] first stated this conjecture 1907, but as a theorem rather than as a conjecture. However, his proof was faulty and in 1922 he retracted his claim and stated the conjecture as an open problem.
Carmichael proved that any counterexample to his conjecture (that is, a value ''n'' such that φ(''n'') is different from the totients of all other numbers) must be at least 10<sup>37</sup>, and [[Victor Klee]] extended this result to 10<sup>400</sup>. Carmichael's conjecture has since been verified computationally for all ''n'' less than or equal to 10<sup>10<sup>7</sup></sup> by Schlafly and Wagon. The current lower bound for a counterexample to the Conjecture is 10<sup>10<sup>10</sup></sup>, which was determined by Kevin Ford in 1998. Ford went on to prove that if there exists a counterexample to the Conjecture, then a positive fraction (that is infinitely many) of the integers are likewise counterexamples.
Although the conjecture is widely believed, [[Carl Pomerance]] gave a sufficient condition for an integer ''n'' to be a counterexample to the conjecture. According to this condition, ''n'' is a counterexample if for every prime ''p'' such that ''p'' − 1 divides φ(''n''), ''p''<sup>2</sup> divides ''n''. However Pomerance showed that the existence of such an integer is highly improbable.
Another way of stating Carmichael's conjecture is that, if
|