Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Discoveries/Log/2008/September: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 11:
::No real problem, though as I said, a Taiwan-school-stub would make more sense, and I'd suggest renaming and rescoping this one appropriately, especially if you're intent on filling it up rapidly. In most cases, {{cl|Foo education stubs}} are made largely as holders for separate school and university stub subcategories, and the -edu- templates are mainly used for things which don't really fall under either. This is the case, for instance, with the United States education stubs category you mentioned. Note that they should ''never'' be used for biographical articles in individual educators, as you have done with quite a number of articles since I listed this category here! As for the Hong Kong category, it was largely the work of an editor who was long a thorn in the side of the stub-sorting project, and we simply haven't got around to renaming it yet :/ [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''<small><font color="#008822">[[User_talk:Grutness|wha?]]</font></small>'' 09:31, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
:::Hmm; perhaps if I simply created Template:Taiwan-school-stub as well, and have Taiwan-school-stub and Template:Taiwan-university-stub add articles to [[:Category:Taiwan education stubs]]. The policies regarding all this could be made somewhat clearer. I saw educators under the Hong Kong category and assumed they belonged; note that Hong Kong and Singapore are the largest Asian school categories, at least for WikiProject Schools, so I hope those categories are made clearer. I also work on all of the base [[:Category:Schools]] from time to time, and it's often a mess. Was there a specific guideline page regarding education stubs? Thanks, --[[User:Jh12|Jh12]] ([[User talk:Jh12|talk]]) 09:40, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
::::Not as far as I know - it is a little ad hoc, as you point out above. Theoretically, a new {{tl|Taiwan-school-stub}} should be proposed at [[WP:WSS/P]] too - just for form, since I doubt there'd be any objections (it's a speediable type). It may even have enough stubs for its own category (which would be a subcat of both {{cl|
==={{tl|England-footy-midfielder-1870s-stub}} (upmerged)===
| |||