Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/FA Template Protection Bot: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Forgot it |
Ultraexactzz (talk | contribs) →Discussion: question |
||
Line 117:
::I'm going to go out on a limb here and add {{BotApproved}}. I feel that there is community consensus for this bot to run on a separate flagged account. This doesn't seem like a precarious task either, as it has been running under Chris G's account for quite a while. To comments about the concerns, here's what I say: There is little to none chance that a vandal can cause a vandalized template to be protected due to the safety function that has been added. In addition, those people who believe that this will be a skynet incident: I think that we have a trustworthy operator here. Chris G has the state of mind to know what a great responsibility he has here. If he violates it, we will definitely take action. I am copying this over to [[WP:AN]], [[WP:VPM]], and [[WP:BN]] to get the word out. If anyone wants to stab or trout me for this, please remember to be civil. Good luck, Chris. [[User:X!|<span style="font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica;color:steelblue;">'''X'''</span>]][[User talk:X!|<span style="color:steelblue;"><small>clamation point</small></span>]] 03:03, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
:::Reopening for comments. [[User:X!|<span style="font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica;color:steelblue;">'''X'''</span>]][[User talk:X!|<span style="color:steelblue;"><small>clamation point</small></span>]] 04:03, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
*I'm missing something; did the bot end up being coded to notify someone when a recently-edited template is added to the FA? [[User:Ultraexactzz|UltraExactZZ]] <sup> [[User_talk:Ultraexactzz|Claims]] </sup>~<small> [[Special:Contributions/Ultraexactzz|Evidence]] </small> 13:58, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
| |||