Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/FA Template Protection Bot: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Flags: ++ |
→Flags: me too |
||
Line 126:
*As a BAG member I agree that this request meets the requirements laid down in [[WP:ADMINBOTS]] to receive the +bot and + sysop userrights flags. '''[[User:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFFF00;background-color: #0000FF;'>MBisanz</span>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 01:50, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
*Looks good to me. <font face="Broadway">[[User:Mr.Z-man|Mr.]][[User talk:Mr.Z-man|'''''Z-'''man'']]</font> 03:30, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
*Me too. See my cross post on bot policy. ":::I feel there is sufficient community for admin bots with BAG and crat approval, ie, without an RFA. However, I think these bots should run under their own account, not under the operator’s admin account. I also think that these bots should not be coded to unblock themselves—that I simply can not support. This weekend Maxim said he wanted to approve Cyde bot but I said I felt we weren’t quite ready to approve admin bots-I think FA bot needs to be settled first-and that I think these bots should run under separate accounts. I also think all existing admin bots that are not approved need to go through the BAG/crat approval process and be separated from their owner’s accounts." <span style="font-family: verdana;"> — [[User:Rlevse|<span style="color:#060;">'''''R''levse'''</span>]] • [[User_talk:Rlevse|<span style="color:#990;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 12:21, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
| |||