Aggiustamento strutturale: differenze tra le versioni

Versione delle 15:35, 23 mag 2009

Versione delle 17:48, 26 mag 2009

Riga 100:

However, there are some serious problems in measuring the empirical success of Fund programs. It is extremely difficult to calculate the counterfactual; that is, what would have happened had the Fund not intervened. Indeed, the 'before and after' evidence of success in the balance of payments is weaker than calculations of success relative to the counterfactual. <ref name=Bird>Bird, G. "IMF Programs: Do they Work? Can they be made to work better?" World Development vol 29, no.11 (2001)</ref> ---->

==Confronto tra i SAPs del FMI e quelli della Banca Mondiale==

==IMF SAPs versus World bank SAPs==

{{T|inglese|economia|maggio 2009}}

<!----While both the [[IMF]] and [[World Bank]] loanfinanziano toi paesi depressed ande developinga countriesquelli in via di sviluppo, theiri loansloro arefinanziamenti sono intended to address differentproblematiche problemsdifferenti. Il TheFondo InternationalMonetario MonetaryInternazionale Fundpresta mainlyprincipalmente lendsai topaesi countriesche thathanno haveproblemi balancenella ofbilancia paymentdei problemspagamenti (they can not pay their international debts), while the World bank offers loans to fund particular development projects.--->

===IMF SAPs===