Revision as of 04:37, 29 September 2005 edit Zen-master (talk \| contribs) 5,220 edits →Fanatic is a word to avoid ← Previous edit		Revision as of 04:40, 29 September 2005 edit undo SlimVirgin (talk \| contribs) 172,064 edits →"Conspiracy" is also a word to avoid? Next edit →
Line 886: :::I am not saying it should be completely avoided, I support the change of this policy to "words to be careful with". However, when used in a descriptive sense the word "conspiracy" is problematic. If someone is charged with "conspiracy" in a legal context then that is definitely ok to use. But generally I don't think "conspiracy" is neutral in titles, what do others think? [[User:Zen-master\|zen master]][[User talk:Zen-master\| T]] 04:14, 29 September 2005 (UTC) ::::It's been agreed that conspiracy theory is fine in titles, so by implication people seem to feel conspiracy is okay so long as it's used correctly. [[User:SlimVirgin\|SlimVirgin]] <sup><font color="Purple">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin\|(talk)]]</font></sup> 04:40, 29 September 2005 (UTC) ==Fanatic is a word to avoid==

Wikipedia talk:Words to avoid: Difference between revisions