Revision as of 07:49, 6 October 2008 edit Mission Fleg (talk \| contribs) 2,013 edits keep ← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:20, 6 October 2008 edit undo Pcap (talk \| contribs) Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 18,285 edits m Listing on WP:DELSORT under Software Next edit →
Line 9: * '''Merge''' - I contest the methods used to conduct the "Google test". Using <code>"Spin (programming language)"</code> is an unrealistic construct. No one is going to write a book, for example, which says: "'''Spin (programming language)''' is used to program xyz". In five seconds, which includes typing and Internet latecy, I found one reliable source: [http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1289314 David A. Scanlan, Martin A. Hebel. "Programming the eight-core propeller chip" ''Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges'', Volume 23, Issue 1, October 2007.] I think merge-able content in the article should be merged into [[Parallax Propeller]] and Spin be redirected, as the programming language is "coupled" to the Parallax Propeller and doesn't achieve enough notability for now. Being unfamiliar with the subject, I willing to change my recommendation if someone tells me otherwise. [[User:Rilak\|Rilak]] ([[User talk:Rilak\|talk]]) 06:57, 6 October 2008 (UTC) * '''Keep''' - given that Rilak found some sources. i think its detailed enuf to warrant its own page too.[[User:Mission Fleg\|Mission Fleg]] ([[User talk:Mission Fleg\|talk]]) 07:49, 6 October 2008 (UTC) *<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software\|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. </small> <small>-- [[User:VasileGaburici\|VG]] [[User_talk:VasileGaburici\|☎]] 20:20, 6 October 2008 (UTC)</small>

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spin (programming language): Difference between revisions