Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by 212.219.22.4 to last version by Bkwillwm |
|||
Line 97:
===Critique of bourgeois democracy and of anti-Semitism===
Most scholars reject this claim for two reasons: first, it is based on two short essays written in the [[1840]]s, and ignores the bulk of Marx's analysis of capitalism written in the following years. Second, it distorts the argument of ''On the Jewish Question'', in which Marx deconstructs [[liberal]] notions of [[emancipation]]. During [[the Enlightenment]], philosophers and political theorists argued that religious authority had been oppressing human beings, and that [[religion]] must be separated from the functions of the state for people to be truly free. Following the [[French Revolution]], many people were thus calling for the [[Jewish emancipation|emancipation of the Jews]].
Marx rejects Bauer's argument as a form of Christian [[ethnocentrism]], if not [[anti-Semitic]]. Marx proceeds to turn Bauer's language, and the rhetoric of anti-Semites, upside down to make a more progressive argument. First, he points out that Bruno Bauer's argument is too parochial because it considers Christianity to be more evolved than Judaism, and because it narrowly defines the problem that requires emancipation to be religion. Marx instead argues that the issue is not religion, but capitalism. Pointing out that anti-Semitic stereotypes of Jews are fundamentally [[anti-capitalist]], Marx provides a theory of anti-Semitism by suggesting that anti-Semites scapegoat Jews for capitalism because too many non-Jews benefit from, or are invested in capitalism, to attack capitalism directly.
|