Comparison of multi-paradigm programming languages: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m updated C++ link
Corrected paradigm count and placement (my mistake) of two languages: REBOL, Lua.
Line 13:
**[[Dylan programming language|Dylan]]
**[[Ocaml|Objective Caml]]
*functional, imperative, object-oriented, ([[Prototype-based programming|prototype-based]])
**[[REBOL]]
*imperative, object-oriented
**[[Perl]]
Line 23 ⟶ 25:
**[[Python programming language|Python]]
**[[Ruby_programming_language|Ruby]]
*functional, imperative, object-oriented, [[Prototype-based programming|(prototype-based]])
**[[Lua programming language|Lua]]
**[[REBOL]]
*[[Generic programming|generic]] ([[template]] [[metaprogramming]]), imperative, object-oriented
**[[C plus plus|C++]]
Line 32 ⟶ 34:
*functional, imperative, [[Logic programming|logic-based]], object-oriented
**[[Leda programming language|Leda]]
*functional, imperative, object-oriented, prototype-based
**[[Lua programming language|Lua]]
 
===Five paradigms===