Wikipedia talk:Speedy deletion/Proposal/Blatant copyvio material: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Titoxd (talk | contribs)
Do we close it now?
Line 305:
::*As the drafter of this phrase, i would argue that it is in no way wrong. I do tend to use soemwhat more formal and perhaps even old-fashioned turns of phrase in soem cases, and I don't object to the change (I think this is partly due to the result of editing a previous longer version at the same time that notification was changed from "must" to "should"). [[User:DESiegel|DES]] [[User talk:DESiegel|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 17:12, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
::*I went ahead and made the change, since it shortens the text and may improve its readability, and in no way changes the meaning. [[User:DESiegel|DES]] [[User talk:DESiegel|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 17:26, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
 
== Do we close it now? ==
 
It seems like we have agreed on a new CSD (might I suggest A8?), since the vote goes 100 support/2 neutral/6 oppose. So, do we close the vote now? It has about an hour to go before the end date of October 1 comes, and unless a sock-flood comes, it won't dip under the 70% approval cut-off line. [[User:Titoxd|Tito]]<font color="#008000">[[User_talk:Titoxd|xd]]</font> 23:04, 30 September 2005 (UTC)