Revision as of 14:31, 14 October 2008 edit MBisanz (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 126,668 edits listing ← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:28, 14 October 2008 edit undo Nishkid64 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 51,999 edits →ResearchEditor: CU results. Next edit →
Line 10: * '''Supporting evidence:''' ResearchEditor (aka {{user\|Abuse truth}} aka {{user\|Abuse t}}) is topic-banned from [[Satanic ritual abuse]] articles (see his talk page). Recently a couple of SPAs have turned up at the SRA page, pushing exactly the same POV as Abuse truth did, and with suspicious knowledge of Wikipedia policy and terminology (Extrabreeze's first edit summary refers to a "cfork"). I call bullshit, and would like to have this CU-confirmed. Meatpuppetry I am convinced of: socking is perfectly plausible. If the former, I'll deal with this via revert restrictions: if the latter we can move straight to blocking. [[User:Moreschi\|Moreschi]] ([[User talk:Moreschi\|talk]]) 14:29, 14 October 2008 (UTC) *{{user\|Albigolow}} is {{unrelated}}. {{Possible}} that {{user\|ResearchEditor}} = {{user\|Extrabreeze}}, based on geographical similarities. {{Likely}} that ResearchEditor = {{user\|Baawip80}}, same home ISP from same city. <span style="background:#E0FFFF;color:#007FFF;font-family:Georgia;">[[User:Nishkid64\|Nishkid64]] </span><sub>([[User talk:Nishkid64\|Make articles, not wikidrama]])</sub> 15:28, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/ResearchEditor: Difference between revisions