DrPizza

Revision as of 04:41, 2 October 2005

Revision as of 05:04, 2 October 2005

Line 16:

::::::Your rationale for removing my (correct) edits can't have been because I called you an idiot because I only called you an idiot after you removed the edits. I believe that by removing an edit without even bothering to read it and then posting a patronizing message on my talk page you were far from respectful. I think the talk pages exist so that people can discuss contentious issues. But since the edits I made weren't contentious (because they were simple facts provided with a source) there was no need for discussion. Where did you demonstrate "working as a team" when you decided to remove the edits? [[User:DrPizza|DrPizza]] 04:41, 2 October 2005 (UTC)

::::::Where do you come in with the right to call someone names, is that the only justification you can some up with? Calling names is still unjustified childish behaviour. For example, if I said you did something foolish, it is very different from me calling you a fool. Such a comment as you made is still unjustified. I still believe it was contentious since NTFS was meant from the beginning for the Windows operating system, as was already noted. Do you actually choose to miss my point? [[User:Quadra23|Quadra23]] Oct 1, 2005.

Hey, Quadra23. If you doubt that DrPizza and "Not DrPizza" are distinct individuals, how about clicking on the history tab? It might be rather enlightening. Although [[logic]] does not seem to be your strong suit. You claim that DrPizza insulted you "behind your back", specifically calling you "idiot", yet you show no evidence for this. And, yes, you have failed to relent the point you attempted to defend (that your original list of reserved addresses is reserved by NTFS), instead introducing logical fallacies and diversionary tactics when faced with incontrovertible facts. Also, DrPizza is not a North American english speaker, and thus, unless you really wish to risk stepping on a lot of non-North American toes, I'd suggest you refrain from your already broken argument about language and intentions. BTW, the links were in his original edit on the page, again, shown by the history tab. Also, I'd note that the only one accusing the other of immaturity or any other alleged character flaws, is you, [[User:Quadra23]]. If you're going to make such a serious allegation, [[rhetoric]] dictates you at least have a basis in fact for it. Thus far, you've only shown some tenuous and unsustainable argument about "language" and "intention".