Hardware-in-the-loop simulation: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Reverted 1 edit by 68.248.21.226 identified as vandalism to last revision by Dicklyon. (TW)
Line 26:
The tight development schedules associated with most new automotive, aerospace and defense programs do not allow embedded system testing to wait for a prototype to be available. In fact, most new development schedules assume that HIL simulation will be used in parallel with the development of the plant. For example, by the time a new [[Internal combustion engine|automobile engine]] prototype is made available for control system testing, 95% of the engine controller testing will have been completed using HIL simulation.
 
The aerospace and defense industries are even more likely to impose a tight development schedule. Aircraft and land vehicle development programs are using desktop and HIL simulation to perform design, test, and integration in parallel.
blah blah blay
 
===High-burden-rate plant===