Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by 82.181.190.197 - "" |
comment on equation correctness |
||
Line 3:
---
The description is very hard to follow. It is incomplete, being based upon and making reference to a book that is not available online. The one-dimensional vectors are written wrongly in the matrix formulas (horizontal instead of vertical). IMO, this article needs a fundamental re-writing, it is extremely frustrating to read as it is.
--- <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Mihai preda|Mihai preda]] ([[User talk:Mihai preda|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Mihai preda|contribs]]) 16:22, 15 July 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->▼
---
Line 15 ⟶ 18:
b_{k+1:t} = TO_{k+1}b_{k+2:t}
no point product with f, no normalization
You multiply the b with the corresponding f in each time slice to obtained the smoothed vectors sv, as shown on pp. 544 eq (15.6). So as written, there are two multiplications by f taking place! Eq 15.7 shows how the RHS of 15.6 breaks down, NOT the LHS.▼
---
▲You multiply the b with the corresponding f in each time slice to obtained the smoothed vectors sv. So as written, there are two multiplications by f taking place!
▲--- <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/82.181.190.197|82.181.190.197]] ([[User talk:82.181.190.197|talk]]) 17:38, 22 October 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
▲--- <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Mihai preda|Mihai preda]] ([[User talk:Mihai preda|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Mihai preda|contribs]]) 16:22, 15 July 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
The word 'umbrella' appears suddenly in the middle of the example.
What is this t=1 'umbrella'?
| |||