Template talk:Parallel computing: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 02:13, 23 October 2008

Revision as of 02:21, 23 October 2008

Line 24:

:Those are all relevant to parallel computing. Why would you think they weren't? [[User:Georgewilliamherbert|Georgewilliamherbert]] ([[User talk:Georgewilliamherbert|talk]]) 02:11, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

::Ramu50 - can you do me a favor? Please go read Pfister's "In search of Clusters", and get back to us... [[User:Georgewilliamherbert|Georgewilliamherbert]] ([[User talk:Georgewilliamherbert|talk]]) 02:13, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

That is totally not true, Flynn's Taxtonomy, MIMO, SIMO, LIFO, FIFO...etc are all methodologies of processors microarchitecture implementations technologies, the fact that Parallel Computing, Distributed Computing, and Grid Computing utilize those technologies doesn't prove they are parallel computing technologies at all, even though the industry say so. What type of technologies you computational technologies you utilize from other types of sciences is a personal opinion or a corporation opinion of how a product is being built. I think a too many people is mixing it up, I just look through some of the talk page and there has been a lot of talk on LIFO and FIFO.

-

- Well if my above statement is wrong, then consequently anything that is a microarchitecture arrays design such as should also be Parallel Computing which is not true. Multiplexing

- * ''[[SISO]]'' (Single Input, Single Output)

- * ''SIMO'' (Single Input, Multiple Outputs)

- * ''MISO'' (Multiple Inputs, Single Output)

- * ''[[MIMO]]'' (Multiple Inputs, Multiple Outputs)

- --[[User:Ramu50|Ramu50]] ([[User talk:Ramu50|talk]]) 02:21, 23 October 2008 (UTC)