Revision as of 02:21, 23 October 2008 edit Ramu50 (talk \| contribs) 2,818 edits mNo edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 02:22, 23 October 2008 edit undo Ramu50 (talk \| contribs) 2,818 edits mNo edit summary Next edit →
Line 25: ::Ramu50 - can you do me a favor? Please go read Pfister's "In search of Clusters", and get back to us... [[User:Georgewilliamherbert\|Georgewilliamherbert]] ([[User talk:Georgewilliamherbert\|talk]]) 02:13, 23 October 2008 (UTC) That is totally not true, Flynn's Taxtonomy, MIMO, SIMO, LIFO, FIFO...etc are all methodologies of processors microarchitecture implementations technologies, the fact that Parallel Computing, Distributed Computing, and Grid Computing utilize those technologies doesn't prove they are parallel computing technologies at all, even though the industry say so. What type of technologies you computational technologies you utilize from other types of sciences is a personal opinion or a corporation opinion of how a product is being built. I think a too many people is mixing it up, I just look through some of the talk page and there has been a lot of problems on the talk on LIFO and FIFO. Well if my above statement is wrong, then consequently anything that is a microarchitecture arrays design such as should also be Parallel Computing which is not true. Multiplexing

Template talk:Parallel computing: Difference between revisions