Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 24:
:Those are all relevant to parallel computing. Why would you think they weren't? [[User:Georgewilliamherbert|Georgewilliamherbert]] ([[User talk:Georgewilliamherbert|talk]]) 02:11, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
::Ramu50 - can you do me a favor? Please go read Pfister's "In search of Clusters", and get back to us... [[User:Georgewilliamherbert|Georgewilliamherbert]] ([[User talk:Georgewilliamherbert|talk]]) 02:13, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
::What make you thinks that all other have a less knowledge than you to even begin with, load of crap on bias contributions attitude. --[[User:Ramu50|Ramu50]] ([[User talk:Ramu50|talk]]) 02:24, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
That is totally not true, Flynn's Taxtonomy, MIMO, SIMO, LIFO, FIFO...etc are all methodologies of processors microarchitecture implementations technologies, the fact that Parallel Computing, Distributed Computing, and Grid Computing utilize those technologies doesn't prove they are parallel computing technologies at all, even though the industry say so. What type of technologies you computational technologies you utilize from other types of sciences is a personal opinion or a corporation opinion of how a product is being built. I think too many people is mixing it up, I just look through some of the talk page and there has been a lot of problems on the talk on LIFO and FIFO.
| |||