Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
→Questions: dangerous to try to organize what you do not understand. |
||
Line 25:
::Ramu50 - can you do me a favor? Please go read Pfister's "In search of Clusters", and get back to us... [[User:Georgewilliamherbert|Georgewilliamherbert]] ([[User talk:Georgewilliamherbert|talk]]) 02:13, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
::What make you thinks that all other have a less knowledge than you to even begin with, load of crap on bias contributions attitude. --[[User:Ramu50|Ramu50]] ([[User talk:Ramu50|talk]]) 02:24, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
:::You are not showing evidence that you're familiar with basic college student level conceptual understanding of several technologies you're trying to classify here. It is not safe to be trying to organize things you do not clearly understand. Either there is a concepts / understanding / education gap here - in which case you need to go spend a while studying, or there's a horrible communications gap here. If you have studied the topics and have the educational background, please explain so. If you have not, please stop editing templates in these fields. [[User:Georgewilliamherbert|Georgewilliamherbert]] ([[User talk:Georgewilliamherbert|talk]]) 02:58, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
That is totally not true, Flynn's Taxtonomy, MIMO, SIMO, LIFO, FIFO...etc are all methodologies of processors microarchitecture implementations technologies, the fact that Parallel Computing, Distributed Computing, and Grid Computing utilize those technologies doesn't prove they are parallel computing technologies at all, even though the industry say so. What type of technologies you computational technologies you utilize from other types of sciences is a personal opinion or a corporation opinion of how a product is being built. I think too many people is mixing it up, I just look through some of the talk page and there has been a lot of problems on the talk on LIFO and FIFO.
| |||