Content deleted Content added
→Survey: three citations to published, peer reviewed, university- or professional-standard texts, since you asked so nicely. |
→Support for Internet Explorer's box model: That's what this article is about |
||
Line 355:
: First of all, the article is not very long, including more detail gives user perspective of the current situation. Secondly, as far as I know, none of the modules is finalized, so citing one while ignoring another constitute favoritism/censorship. I don't even know why this article try to pin the problem on IE, since [http://www.websiteoptimization.com/speed/7/7-2.html Netscape had a non-W3C box model]. --[[User:Voidvector|Voidvector]] ([[User talk:Voidvector|talk]]) 20:13, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
:::This article is about the ''Internet Explorer box model bug'', that's why it focuses on IE and on this particular bug. Your new edits may be straying off that central subject into less relevant topics like recent W3C spec drafts, recent obscure Mozilla features etc. --[[User:Nigelj|Nigelj]] ([[User talk:Nigelj|talk]]) 20:48, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
:: Further proof that box model difference is not an IE-only problem: [http://www.xs4all.nl/~ppk/css2tests/box.html an old version of PPK's reference page]. (press Cancel) --[[User:Voidvector|Voidvector]] ([[User talk:Voidvector|talk]]) 20:35, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
| |||