Content deleted Content added
SlimVirgin (talk | contribs) Overtaken |
What do you think about User Rangerdude contributions? |
||
Line 1,012:
Now SlimVirgin 16,854, Willmcw 16,941: spooky. Does this mean we're more than just a POV possé, but now actually the same person? ;-D You've done many more edits to articles than me, though. I spend too much time on talk pages, desperately trying to justify myself. [[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]] <sup><font color="Purple">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|(talk)]]</font></sup> 18:15, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
== What do you think about User Rangerdude contributions? ==
Hi!
I used english Wikipedia to get information about [[James M. McPherson]] to create an article in german Wikipedia. I wonder if the mentioned critic [[Thomas DiLorenzo]] is reliable. The article about him tells that he's related to the [[League of the South]]. Have you read the wikipedia information about this organisation? I don't know whether they are harmless or extremist. The relation of DiLorenzo to such an organisation does not automatically conclude not reliable statements about McPherson but the mentioned DiLorenzo predicitions I've read in the McPherson article are IMHO POV, disproportionate or absolutely not true. Especially that ''marxism''-allegation. I've just read ''Battle Cry of Freedom'', but this several times, and I found absolutely no appearance of Marxism. Seems more like an "MacCarthy"-style accusation.
What do you think? Should I mention this DiLorenzo guy in the german article?
I tried do mention DiLorenzo's relation to the [[League of the South]] so the reader himself can judge the reliability of this critic, but user Rangerdude is watching this article like a guard dog to defend his as I guess POV contributions, so I had no chance and didn't want to start a edit war without knowing more about DiLorenzo criticism.
[[User:E^(nix)|E^(nix)]] 18:20, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
| |||